[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200330183824.GI24988@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:38:24 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/37] KVM: nVMX: Invalidate all EPTP contexts when
emulating INVEPT for L1
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 05:12:04PM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 4:51 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 23/03/20 17:44, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > So I think
> > >
> > > Fixes: 14c07ad89f4d ("x86/kvm/mmu: introduce guest_mmu")
> > >
> > > would be appropriate?
> > >
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I think it was actually commit efebf0aaec3d ("KVM: nVMX: Do not flush
> TLB on L1<->L2 transitions if L1 uses VPID and EPT").
Hmm, commit efebf0aaec3d it only changed flushing behavior, it didn't
affect KVM's behavior with respect to refreshing unsync'd SPTE, i.e.
reloading guest_mmu.
It's somewhat of a moot point, because _technically_ there is no bug since,
at the time of this fix, KVM always flushes and reloads on nested VM-Enter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists