| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f049524d9789d005ba83b51d30011bcb@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:03:30 -0700
From: rishabhb@...eaurora.org
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: qcom: Add bus scaling capability during
bootup
On 2020-03-30 09:13, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 10:06, Mathieu Poirier
> <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rishabh,
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 18:59, Rishabh Bhatnagar
>> <rishabhb@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > During bootup since remote processors cannot request for
>> > additional bus bandwidth from the interconect framework,
>> > platform driver should provide the proxy resources. This
>> > is useful for scenarios where the Q6 tries to access the DDR
>> > memory in the initial stages of bootup. For e.g. during
>> > bootup or after recovery modem Q6 tries to zero out the bss
>> > section in the DDR. Since this is a big chunk of memory if
>> > don't bump up the bandwidth we might encounter timeout issues.
>> > This patch makes a proxy vote for maximizing the bus bandwidth
>> > during bootup and removes it once processor is up.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> The title of this patch contains "[PATCH 1/2]" but only one patch was
>> sent to the linux-remoteproc mailing list. Is this a mistake and this
>> is a stand alone patch or another patch did not reach the list?
>>
>
> I see that you sent another patch [1] that seems to be stand alone but
> when looking into the code function of_icc_get() is called, which does
> reference the bindings in [1].
>
> [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11463381/
>
>> Thanks,
>> Mathieu
Yes its supposed to be a patchset of 2, somehow the numbering got messed
up.
I'll resend the two patches so that you can take a look.
>>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> > index edf9d0e..8f5db8d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>> > #include <linux/qcom_scm.h>
>> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> > #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>> > +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
>> > #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
>> > #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
>> > #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
>> > @@ -28,6 +29,9 @@
>> > #include "qcom_q6v5.h"
>> > #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>> >
>> > +#define PIL_TZ_AVG_BW 0
>> > +#define PIL_TZ_PEAK_BW UINT_MAX
>> > +
>> > struct adsp_data {
>> > int crash_reason_smem;
>> > const char *firmware_name;
>> > @@ -62,6 +66,7 @@ struct qcom_adsp {
>> > int proxy_pd_count;
>> >
>> > int pas_id;
>> > + struct icc_path *bus_client;
>> > int crash_reason_smem;
>> > bool has_aggre2_clk;
>> >
>> > @@ -124,6 +129,25 @@ static int adsp_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static int do_bus_scaling(struct qcom_adsp *adsp, bool enable)
>> > +{
>> > + int rc;
>> > + u32 avg_bw = enable ? PIL_TZ_AVG_BW : 0;
>> > + u32 peak_bw = enable ? PIL_TZ_PEAK_BW : 0;
>> > +
>> > + if (adsp->bus_client) {
>> > + rc = icc_set_bw(adsp->bus_client, avg_bw, peak_bw);
>> > + if (rc) {
>> > + dev_err(adsp->dev, "bandwidth request failed(rc:%d)\n",
>> > + rc);
>> > + return rc;
>> > + }
>> > + } else
>> > + dev_info(adsp->dev, "Bus scaling not setup for %s\n",
>> > + adsp->rproc->name);
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> > {
>> > struct qcom_adsp *adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
>> > @@ -131,9 +155,13 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> >
>> > qcom_q6v5_prepare(&adsp->q6v5);
>> >
>> > + ret = do_bus_scaling(adsp, true);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + goto disable_irqs;
>> > +
>> > ret = adsp_pds_enable(adsp, adsp->active_pds, adsp->active_pd_count);
>> > if (ret < 0)
>> > - goto disable_irqs;
>> > + goto unscale_bus;
>> >
>> > ret = adsp_pds_enable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
>> > if (ret < 0)
>> > @@ -183,6 +211,8 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> > adsp_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
>> > disable_active_pds:
>> > adsp_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->active_pds, adsp->active_pd_count);
>> > +unscale_bus:
>> > + do_bus_scaling(adsp, false);
>> > disable_irqs:
>> > qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&adsp->q6v5);
>> >
>> > @@ -198,6 +228,7 @@ static void qcom_pas_handover(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5)
>> > clk_disable_unprepare(adsp->aggre2_clk);
>> > clk_disable_unprepare(adsp->xo);
>> > adsp_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
>> > + do_bus_scaling(adsp, false);
>> > }
>> >
>> > static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> > @@ -280,6 +311,14 @@ static int adsp_init_regulator(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
>> > return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(adsp->px_supply);
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static void adsp_init_bus_scaling(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
>> > +{
>> > + adsp->bus_client = of_icc_get(adsp->dev, NULL);
>> > + if (!adsp->bus_client)
>> > + dev_warn(adsp->dev, "%s: unable to get bus client \n",
>> > + __func__);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static int adsp_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs,
>> > char **pd_names)
>> > {
>> > @@ -410,6 +449,8 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > if (ret)
>> > goto free_rproc;
>> >
>> > + adsp_init_bus_scaling(adsp);
>> > +
>> > ret = adsp_pds_attach(&pdev->dev, adsp->active_pds,
>> > desc->active_pd_names);
>> > if (ret < 0)
>> > --
>> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
>> > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists