linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] perf/tools: Enhance JSON/metric infrastructure to handle "?"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200330193558.GD2490231@krava>
Date:   Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:35:58 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, jmario@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        paulus@...abs.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mpetlan@...hat.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        mamatha4@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] perf/tools: Enhance JSON/metric infrastructure to
 handle "?"

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:55:26PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:

SNIP

>  
>  %%
>  	struct expr_scanner_ctx *sctx = expr_get_extra(yyscanner);
> @@ -93,7 +106,7 @@ if		{ return IF; }
>  else		{ return ELSE; }
>  #smt_on		{ return SMT_ON; }
>  {number}	{ return value(yyscanner, 10); }
> -{symbol}	{ return str(yyscanner, ID); }
> +{symbol}	{ return str(yyscanner, ID, sctx->runtime_param); }
>  "|"		{ return '|'; }
>  "^"		{ return '^'; }
>  "&"		{ return '&'; }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> index b905eaa907a7..66695b4a358d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct egroup {
>  	const char *metric_name;
>  	const char *metric_expr;
>  	const char *metric_unit;
> +	int param;

could you please use runtime_param everywhere? ... s/param/runtime_param/
or maybe just 'runtime' to keep it short..? it's param in any case ;-)

other than that it looks ok

jirka