[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <749b7fb7-06c2-bde3-55e9-03232287d727@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:19:08 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: luanshi <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: move error checking into common path
On 2020-03-31 2:59 pm, luanshi wrote:
> Move error checking into common path to be consistent with
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index aa3ac2a..970f1c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -3889,13 +3889,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> smmu->dev = dev;
>
> - if (dev->of_node) {
> + if (dev->of_node)
> ret = arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(pdev, smmu);
> - } else {
> + else
> ret = arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe(pdev, smmu);
> - if (ret == -ENODEV)
> - return ret;
> - }
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
This completely changes the flow WRT the bypass decision below, so
without a clear justification of why that's OK, NAK.
Robin.
>
> /* Set bypass mode according to firmware probing result */
> bypass = !!ret;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists