lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:26:40 +0200
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] powerpc/platforms: Move files from 4xx to 44x



Le 31/03/2020 à 17:14, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:49 AM Christophe Leroy
> <christophe.leroy@....fr> wrote:
>>
>> Only 44x uses 4xx now, so only keep one directory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Makefile           |  9 +++++++-
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/{4xx => 44x}/cpm.c     |  0
> 
> No objections to moving everything into one place, but I wonder if the
> combined name should be 4xx instead of 44x, given that 44x currently
> include 46x and 47x. OTOH your approach has the advantage of
> moving fewer files.
> 

In that case, should we also rename CONFIG_44x to CONFIG_4xx ?

Christophe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ