[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200331204643.11262-5-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:46:40 +0100
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org (open list:PROC SYSCTL)
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] sysctl: Add missing annotation for start_unregistering()
Sparse reports a warning at start_unregistering()
warning: context imbalance in start_unregistering()
- unexpected unlock
The root cause is the missing annotation at start_unregistering()
Add the missing __must_hold(&sysctl_lock) annotation.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
---
fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index c75bb4632ed1..d1b5e2b35564 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -307,6 +307,7 @@ static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head)
/* called under sysctl_lock, will reacquire if has to wait */
static void start_unregistering(struct ctl_table_header *p)
+ __must_hold(&sysctl_lock)
{
/*
* if p->used is 0, nobody will ever touch that entry again;
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists