[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200331204643.11262-7-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:46:42 +0100
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org (open list:BTRFS FILE SYSTEM)
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Add missing annotation for btrfs_tree_lock()
Sparse reports a warning at btrfs_tree_lock()
warning: context imbalance in btrfs_tree_lock() - wrong count at exit
The root cause is the missing annotation at btrfs_tree_lock()
Add the missing __acquires(&eb->lock) annotation
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
---
fs/btrfs/locking.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
index 571c4826c428..850fae45a8a4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
* The rwlock is held for write upon exit.
*/
void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+ __acquires(&eb->lock)
{
u64 start_ns = 0;
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists