[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <096a742b-9387-370e-db22-81f220cf7c70@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:29:55 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, mst@...hat.com
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] vdpasim: Rerun status in vdpasim_get_status
On 2020/3/31 上午11:35, YueHaibing wrote:
> vdpasim->status should acquired under spin lock.
>
> Fixes: 870448c31775 ("vdpasim: vDPA device simulator")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/virtio/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> index 6e8a0cf2fdeb..72863d01a12a 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static u8 vdpasim_get_status(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> status = vdpasim->status;
> spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
>
> - return vdpasim->status;
> + return status;
> }
>
> static void vdpasim_set_status(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u8 status)
Typo in the title but patch looks good.
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists