linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: filesystems: Convert sysfs-pci to ReST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:03:46 -0300
From:   Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        brendanhiggins@...gle.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: filesystems: Convert sysfs-pci to
 ReST

On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:57 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:28:56 -0300
> Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
> > ---
> >  .../{sysfs-pci.txt => sysfs-pci.rst}          | 40 ++++++++++-----
> > ----
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >  rename Documentation/filesystems/{sysfs-pci.txt => sysfs-pci.rst}
> > (82%)
> 
> Please supply a changelog with your patches.
> 
> The conversion you have done in this file is incomplete; I suspect
> that
> you have not actually built the docs and seen what the results look
> like.
> There are literal blocks that you have not marked as such, as a
> minimum.
> Please actually do a docs build (after adding this file to index.rst)
> and
> make sure that the output is what you intended.
> 
> One other thing of note...this file dates back to before the Git era,
> and
> while it has seen numerous tweaks since then, it's clearly
> outdated.  Look
> at what's actually under /sys/devices/pci* compared to what's
> documented.
> I will take the conversion without it, but what I would really like
> to see
> would be an effort to document all of the attributes that appear
> there
> with current kernels.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon

Thanks for the review, I will check your comments and correct themif that document is still needed.

BR,
Vitor