[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200331094930.3aipm3zrydpqqhms@ws.net.home>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:49:30 +0200
From: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, dray@...hat.com,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
andres@...razel.de, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Subject: Re: Upcoming: Notifications, FS notifications and fsinfo()
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:56:35AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> I think we are approaching this from the wrong end. Let's just
> ignore all of the proposed interfaces for now and only concentrate on
> what this will be used for.
>
> Start with a set of use cases by all interested parties. E.g.
>
> - systemd wants to keep track attached mounts in a namespace, as well
> as new detached mounts created by fsmount()
>
> - systemd need to keep information (such as parent, children, mount
> flags, fs options, etc) up to date on any change of topology or
> attributes.
>
> - util linux needs to display the topology and state of mounts in the
> system that corresponds to a consistent state that set of mounts
- like systemd we also need in mount/umount to query one mountpoint
rather than parse all /proc/self/mountinfo
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists