[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ8LZMPxrjVkuLizHjVZyBtSmLFZ=EvDCCAPb-XGfJLHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:49:19 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: single target builds are broken
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:16 PM Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I often run 'make foo/bar.o' as part of my workflow, even when bar.o is
> not specified in any kernel makefile, and this has worked just fine for
> years.
>
> This is broken after commit 394053f4a4b3e3eeeaa67b67fc886a9a75bd9e4d
> (kbuild: make single targets work more correctly) and just gives an error:
>
> $ make kernel/test.o
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> DESCEND objtool
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/test.o'. Stop.
> scripts/Makefile.build:502: recipe for target '__build' failed
> make[1]: *** [__build] Error 2
> Makefile:1670: recipe for target 'kernel' failed
> make: *** [kernel] Error 2
This is intentional to make the single target builds
work in the same manner as the normal builds.
The necessary CONFIG dependency must be met.
obj-$(CONFIG_FOO) += foo.o
foo.o can be built only when CONFIG_FOO is y/m.
> For top-level objects (e.g. 'make bar.o') the situation is even worse,
> since make exits with status 0 without building anything :-/
There is no .c or .S file at the top-level of the kernel source tree.
'make bar.o' never happens.
> Is there any chance we can get this back? It was super useful for me.
What you want is "Let's build whatever", right?
No, please add 'obj-y += test.o' if you want to
test your local file.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists