[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200331134249.kf3zyf27xtspmlif@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:42:49 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks
On 2020-03-31 15:25:21 [+0200], Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Geert,
> On arm64 (e.g. R-Car H3 ES2.0):
>
> +=============================
> +[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
> +5.6.0-salvator-x-09423-gb29514ba13a9c459-dirty #679 Not tainted
> +-----------------------------
> +swapper/5/0 is trying to lock:
> +ffffff86ff76f398 (&pool->lock){..-.}-{3:3}, at: __queue_work+0x134/0x430
The pool->lock is not yet converted.
…
> On arm32 (e.g SH-Mobile AG5, using Cortex-A9 TWD):
>
> +=============================
> +[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
> +5.6.0-kzm9g-09424-g2698719b4c4f35db-dirty #253 Not tainted
> +-----------------------------
> +swapper/0/0 is trying to lock:
> +dfbc5250 (&pool->lock){..-.}-{3:3}, at: __queue_work+0x14c/0x4d0
same issue.
> I also see it on other arm32 platforms using Renesas-specific timers,
> but I'll ignore those until the issues with "standard" ARM timers have
> been resolved ;-)
There are some known culprits, like the work infrastructure. The printk
is another one. From Kconfig:
| NOTE: There are known nesting problems. So if you enable this
| option expect lockdep splats until these problems have been fully
| addressed which is work in progress. This config switch allows to
| identify and analyze these problems. It will be removed and the
| check permanentely enabled once the main issues have been fixed.
> Thanks!
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists