[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200401.113627.1377328159361906184.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: olteanv@...il.com
Cc: grygorii.strashko@...com, nsekhar@...com, t-kristo@...com,
peter.ujfalusi@...com, robh@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rogerq@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
m-karicheri2@...com, kishon@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] net: ethernet: ti: add networking
support for k3 am65x/j721e soc
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:27:04 +0300
> I think the ARM64 build is now also broken on Linus' master branch,
> after the net-next merge? I am not quite sure if the device tree
> patches were supposed to land in mainline the way they did.
There's a fix in my net tree and it will go to Linus soon.
There is no clear policy for dt change integration, and honestly
I try to deal with the situation on a case by case basis.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists