linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Make CPUFreq notifier to take into account boosting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:53:07 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Make CPUFreq notifier to
 take into account boosting

01.04.2020 02:29, Chanwoo Choi пишет:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On 3/31/20 8:16 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> MCCPU frequency boosting needs to be taken into account in order to avoid
>> scheduling of unnecessary devfreq updates.
> 
> "in order to avoid scheduling of unnecessary devfreq updates."
> I don't understand the correct meaning of following description.
> Could you explain it more detailed?

Hello Chanwoo,

I'll update the commit message with a more detailed description and make
this patch standalone in v2. Thank you very much for taking a look at
the patches.

BTW, please also take a look at this patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11409037/