[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mu7whr88.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:31:03 +0800
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Jérôme Glisse
<jglisse@...hat.com>, Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /proc/PID/smaps: Add PMD migration entry parsing
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru> writes:
> On 31/03/2020 11.56, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
>>
>> Now, when read /proc/PID/smaps, the PMD migration entry in page table is simply
>> ignored. To improve the accuracy of /proc/PID/smaps, its parsing and processing
>> is added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
>> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
>> index 8d382d4ec067..b5b3aef8cb3b 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
>> @@ -548,8 +548,17 @@ static void smaps_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>> bool locked = !!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED);
>> struct page *page;
>
> struct page *page = NULL;
Looks good. Will do this in the next version.
>> - /* FOLL_DUMP will return -EFAULT on huge zero page */
>> - page = follow_trans_huge_pmd(vma, addr, pmd, FOLL_DUMP);
>> + if (pmd_present(*pmd)) {
>> + /* FOLL_DUMP will return -EFAULT on huge zero page */
>> + page = follow_trans_huge_pmd(vma, addr, pmd, FOLL_DUMP);
>> + } else if (unlikely(is_swap_pmd(*pmd))) {
>> + swp_entry_t entry = pmd_to_swp_entry(*pmd);
>> +
>> + VM_BUG_ON(!is_migration_entry(entry));
>> + page = migration_entry_to_page(entry);
>
> if (is_migration_entry(entry))
> page = migration_entry_to_page(entry);
>
> Seems safer and doesn't add much code.
With this, we lose an opportunity to capture some bugs during debugging.
Right?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
>> + } else {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(page))
>> return;
>> if (PageAnon(page))
>> @@ -578,8 +587,7 @@ static int smaps_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
>> if (ptl) {
>> - if (pmd_present(*pmd))
>> - smaps_pmd_entry(pmd, addr, walk);
>> + smaps_pmd_entry(pmd, addr, walk);
>> spin_unlock(ptl);
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists