[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200401111433.GD20713@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:14:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 08/13] ftrace: Add perf text poke events for ftrace
trampolines
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:42:50PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 1/04/20 1:09 pm, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:06:28AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >> Add perf text poke events for ftrace trampolines when created and when
> >> freed.
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken that ends up like so:
> >
> > static void ftrace_update_trampoline(struct ftrace_ops *ops)
> > {
> > + unsigned long trampoline = ops->trampoline;
> > +
> > arch_ftrace_update_trampoline(ops);
> > + if (ops->trampoline && ops->trampoline != trampoline &&
> >> + (ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_ALLOC_TRAMP)) {
> >> + /* Add to kallsyms before the perf events */
> > + ftrace_add_trampoline_to_kallsyms(ops);
> >> + perf_event_ksymbol(PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL_TYPE_OOL,
> >> + ops->trampoline, ops->trampoline_size, false,
> >> + FTRACE_TRAMPOLINE_SYM);
> >> + /*
> >> + * Record the perf text poke event after the ksymbol register
> >> + * event.
> >> + */
> >> + perf_event_text_poke((void *)ops->trampoline, NULL, 0,
> >> + (void *)ops->trampoline,
> >> + ops->trampoline_size);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > And afaict, that is wrong.
> >
> > The thing is; arch_ftrace_update_trampoline() can actually *update* an
> > existing trampoline, as per the name. Yes it also creates a trampoline
> > if there isn't one already, but if there already is one, it will modify
> > it in-place.
> >
> > I see the appeal of having this event in generic code; but I'm thinking
> > you'll need the update even in arch code anyway, at which point it'd
> > probably be easier to do all of this in arch code.
>
> For x86, we use text_poke_bp for updates which already does text_poke events
> via text_poke_bp_batch.
Ah, indeed! Damn, I even wrote that code :/
> It might be reasonable to assume other architectures will also need to put
> updates through a common text poker which will take care of text_poke events.
You'd better look, I recently rewrote the x86/ftrace code to be 'sane'
and not re-implement all the text poking stuff itself.
But I suppose that any arch adding support for this can fix that up if
needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists