Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:59:02 +0800
From:   Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
To:     Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
Cc:     mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trix@...hat.com, bhu@...hat.com,
        Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] fpga: dfl: pci: add irq info for feature devices
  enumeration

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:41:20PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 04:32:38PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > Some DFL FPGA PCIe cards (e.g. Intel FPGA Programmable Acceleration
> > Card) support MSI-X based interrupts. This patch allows PCIe driver
> > to prepare and pass interrupt resources to DFL via enumeration API.
> > These interrupt resources could then be assigned to actual features
> > which use them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
> > ----
> > v2: put irq resources init code inside cce_enumerate_feature_dev()
> >     Some minor changes for Hao's comments.
> > v3: Some minor fix for Hao's comments for v2.
> > ---
> >  drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > index 5387550..66027aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,28 @@ static void __iomem *cci_pci_ioremap_bar(struct pci_dev *pcidev, int bar)
> >  	return pcim_iomap_table(pcidev)[bar];
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int cci_pci_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > +{
> > +	int nvec = pci_msix_vec_count(pcidev);
> > +	int ret;
> 
> maybe int ret, nvec = pci_msix..
> 
> > +
> > +	if (nvec <= 0) {
> > +		dev_dbg(&pcidev->dev, "fpga interrupt not supported\n");
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pcidev, nvec, nvec, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	return nvec;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void cci_pci_free_irq(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > +{
> > +	pci_free_irq_vectors(pcidev);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* PCI Device ID */
> >  #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X	0xBCBD
> >  #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X	0xBCC0
> > @@ -78,17 +100,33 @@ static void cci_remove_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> >  
> >  	/* remove all children feature devices */
> >  	dfl_fpga_feature_devs_remove(drvdata->cdev);
> > +	cci_pci_free_irq(pcidev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int *cci_pci_create_irq_table(struct pci_dev *pcidev, unsigned int nvec)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i;
> > +	int *table;
> > +
> > +	table = kcalloc(nvec, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (table) {
> > +		for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++)
> > +			table[i] = pci_irq_vector(pcidev, i);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return table;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* enumerate feature devices under pci device */
> >  static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> >  {
> >  	struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = pci_get_drvdata(pcidev);
> > +	int port_num, bar, i, nvec, ret = 0;
> >  	struct dfl_fpga_enum_info *info;
> >  	struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev;
> >  	resource_size_t start, len;
> > -	int port_num, bar, i, ret = 0;
> >  	void __iomem *base;
> > +	int *irq_table;
> >  	u32 offset;
> >  	u64 v;
> >  
> > @@ -97,11 +135,30 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> >  	if (!info)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > +	/* add irq info for enumeration if the device support irq */
> > +	nvec = cci_pci_alloc_irq(pcidev);
> > +	if (nvec < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "Fail to alloc irq %d.\n", nvec);
> > +		ret = nvec;
> > +		goto enum_info_free_exit;
> > +	} else if (nvec) {
> > +		irq_table = cci_pci_create_irq_table(pcidev, nvec);
> > +		if (!irq_table) {
> > +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +			goto irq_free_exit;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		ret = dfl_fpga_enum_info_add_irq(info, nvec, irq_table);
> > +		kfree(irq_table);
> 
> i see you create a function for cci_pci_free_irq instead of using kernel api
> directly, to make it more readable, so why not have a remove irq table function
> here too.

The irq_table is not alloced in cci_pci_alloc_irq,
cci_pci_create_irq_table does. Actually cci_pci_alloc/free_irq are not
related to irq_table for DFL.

So maybe we don't have to change this?

> 
> Actually patch looks good to me, with above minor fixes.
> 
> Acked-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> 
> Hao
> 
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto irq_free_exit;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* start to find Device Feature List from Bar 0 */
> >  	base = cci_pci_ioremap_bar(pcidev, 0);
> >  	if (!base) {
> >  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > -		goto enum_info_free_exit;
> > +		goto irq_free_exit;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -154,7 +211,7 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> >  		dfl_fpga_enum_info_add_dfl(info, start, len, base);
> >  	} else {
> >  		ret = -ENODEV;
> > -		goto enum_info_free_exit;
> > +		goto irq_free_exit;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* start enumeration with prepared enumeration information */
> > @@ -162,11 +219,14 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
> >  		dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "Enumeration failure\n");
> >  		ret = PTR_ERR(cdev);
> > -		goto enum_info_free_exit;
> > +		goto irq_free_exit;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	drvdata->cdev = cdev;
> >  
> > +irq_free_exit:
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		cci_pci_free_irq(pcidev);
> >  enum_info_free_exit:
> >  	dfl_fpga_enum_info_free(info);
> >  
> > @@ -211,12 +271,10 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ret = cci_enumerate_feature_devs(pcidev);
> > -	if (ret) {
> > -		dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "enumeration failure %d.\n", ret);
> > -		goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > -	}
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		return ret;
> >  
> > -	return ret;
> > +	dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "enumeration failure %d.\n", ret);
> >  
> >  disable_error_report_exit:
> >  	pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists