linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][V2] ACPI: sysfs: copy ACPI data using io memory copying

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <698da6fc-3334-5420-5c97-4406914e4599@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:44:34 +0100
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] ACPI: sysfs: copy ACPI data using io memory copying

Hello!

On 3/20/20 1:19 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> [adding James and Lorenzo]

(but not actually...)

> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:54:09PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> Reading ACPI data on ARM64 at a non-aligned offset from
>> /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/data/BERT will cause a splat because
>> the data is I/O memory mapped

On your platform, on someone else's it may be in memory.

Which platform is this on?
(I've never seen one generate a BERT!)

>> and being read with just a memcpy.
>> Fix this by introducing an I/O variant of memory_read_from_buffer
>> and using I/O memory mapped copies instead.

> Just to check, is that correct is it correct to map those tables with
> Device attributes in the first place, or should we be mapping the tables
> with Normal Cacheable attributes with memremap()?
> 
> If the FW placed those into memory using cacheavble attributes, reading
> them using Device attributes could result in stale values, which could
> be garbage.

Yes. The BERT code should be using arch_apei_get_mem_attribute() to use the
correct attributes. See ghes_map() for an example. bert_init() will need to use
a version of ioremap() that takes the pgprot_t.

Always using ioremap_cache() means you get a cacheable mapping, regardless of
how firmware described this region in the UEFI memory map. This doesn't explain
why you got an alignment fault.

Otherwise, looks fine to me.

(N.B. I ignored this patch as it wasn't copied to linux-arm-kernel and the
subject says its about sysfs<->ACPI, nothing to do with APEI!)

Thanks,

James