lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f53ee68-3bcc-7de9-beb9-df812b2e3613@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:43:22 +0100
From:   Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, raphael.gault@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] objtool: check: Ignore empty alternative groups



On 4/1/20 1:53 PM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, Julien Thierry wrote:
> 
>> Atlernative section can contain entries for alternatives with no
>> instructions. Objtool will currently crash when handling such an entry.
>>
>> Just skip that entry, but still give a warning to discourage useless
>> entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/objtool/check.c | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
>> index 74353b2c39ce..5c03460f1f07 100644
>> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
>> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
>> @@ -904,6 +904,12 @@ static int add_special_section_alts(struct objtool_file *file)
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		if (special_alt->group) {
>> +			if (!special_alt->orig_len) {
>> +				WARN_FUNC("empty alternative entry",
>> +					  orig_insn->sec, orig_insn->offset);
>> +				continue;
>> +			}
>> +
>>   			ret = handle_group_alt(file, special_alt, orig_insn,
>>   					       &new_insn);
>>   			if (ret)
> 
> Probably the first time I am looking at alternatives handling in objtool,
> so I must be missing something, but is this even possible now? I mean
> get_alt_entry() in special.c sets alt->orig_len when alt->group is true
> (which means .alternatives section) to something which cannot be zero.
> 

What I see is:

	if (alt->group) {
		alt->orig_len = *(unsigned char *)(sec->data->d_buf + offset +
						   entry->orig_len);
		alt->new_len = *(unsigned char *)(sec->data->d_buf + offset +
                                                   entry->new_len);
	}


And as far as I can tell, "alt->orig_len" can be 0 if the entry in the 
.altinstructions section of the .o file has the length set to 0.

I don't know how the alternative section generation works on x86, but on 
arm64 it's just a computed assembly offset which can be 0.

> Is this a preparatory patch for arm64, where this could happen? If yes, it
> would be better to mention it in the changelog.
> 

It used to happen on arm64, but the fix [1] was picked.

I can add that link to the commit if necessary.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/9/708

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Thierry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ