[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200401135525.GG882512@myrica>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:55:25 +0200
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] iommu/ioasid: Convert to set aware allocations
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:55:27AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> The current ioasid_alloc function takes a token/ioasid_set then record it
> on the IOASID being allocated. There is no alloc/free on the ioasid_set.
>
> With the IOASID set APIs, callers must allocate an ioasid_set before
> allocate IOASIDs within the set. Quota and other ioasid_set level
> activities can then be enforced.
>
> This patch converts existing API to the new ioasid_set model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
[...]
> @@ -379,6 +391,9 @@ ioasid_t ioasid_alloc(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> }
> data->id = id;
>
> + /* Store IOASID in the per set data */
> + xa_store(&sdata->xa, id, data, GFP_KERNEL);
I couldn't figure out why you're maintaining an additional xarray for each
set. We're already storing that data in active_allocator->xa, why the
duplication? If it's for the gPASID -> hPASID translation mentioned by
the cover letter, maybe you could add this xa when introducing that
change?
Thanks,
Jean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists