[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2488734.1585749502@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:58:22 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, dray@...hat.com,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
andres@...razel.de, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Subject: Re: Upcoming: Notifications, FS notifications and fsinfo()
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Attached patch applies against readfile patch.
>
> But doesn't actually do what Karel asked for. show_mountinfo() itself does
> not give you what Karel asked for. Plus there's more information you need to
> add to it.
And arguably, it's worse than just reading /proc/mounts. If you get a
notification that something changed (ie. you poll /proc/mounts or mount
notifications gives you an overrun) you now have to read *every*
/mountfs/*/info file. That is way more expensive.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists