linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 028/116] tcp: repair: fix TCP_QUEUE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  1 Apr 2020 18:16:44 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 028/116] tcp: repair: fix TCP_QUEUE_SEQ implementation

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 6cd6cbf593bfa3ae6fc3ed34ac21da4d35045425 ]

When application uses TCP_QUEUE_SEQ socket option to
change tp->rcv_next, we must also update tp->copied_seq.

Otherwise, stuff relying on tcp_inq() being precise can
eventually be confused.

For example, tcp_zerocopy_receive() might crash because
it does not expect tcp_recv_skb() to return NULL.

We could add tests in various places to fix the issue,
or simply make sure tcp_inq() wont return a random value,
and leave fast path as it is.

Note that this fixes ioctl(fd, SIOCINQ, &val) at the same
time.

Fixes: ee9952831cfd ("tcp: Initial repair mode")
Fixes: 05255b823a61 ("tcp: add TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE support for zerocopy receive")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2870,8 +2870,10 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock
 			err = -EPERM;
 		else if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_SEND_QUEUE)
 			tp->write_seq = val;
-		else if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_RECV_QUEUE)
+		else if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_RECV_QUEUE) {
 			WRITE_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt, val);
+			WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, val);
+		}
 		else
 			err = -EINVAL;
 		break;