[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200401161526.901169434@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 18:17:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
syzbot+f9b32aaacd60305d9687@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+2f8c233f131943d6056d@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+9c2df9fd5e9445b74e01@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 36/91] net_sched: cls_route: remove the right filter from hashtable
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit ef299cc3fa1a9e1288665a9fdc8bff55629fd359 ]
route4_change() allocates a new filter and copies values from
the old one. After the new filter is inserted into the hash
table, the old filter should be removed and freed, as the final
step of the update.
However, the current code mistakenly removes the new one. This
looks apparently wrong to me, and it causes double "free" and
use-after-free too, as reported by syzbot.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+f9b32aaacd60305d9687@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+2f8c233f131943d6056d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+9c2df9fd5e9445b74e01@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1109c00547fc ("net: sched: RCU cls_route")
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/sched/cls_route.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sched/cls_route.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_route.c
@@ -540,8 +540,8 @@ static int route4_change(struct net *net
fp = &b->ht[h];
for (pfp = rtnl_dereference(*fp); pfp;
fp = &pfp->next, pfp = rtnl_dereference(*fp)) {
- if (pfp == f) {
- *fp = f->next;
+ if (pfp == fold) {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*fp, fold->next);
break;
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists