linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] l2tp: ensure sessions are freed after their PPPOL2TP socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200402.125930.1715113142516280666.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     will@...nel.org
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        g.nault@...halink.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] l2tp: ensure sessions are freed after their
 PPPOL2TP socket

Sorry, you will have to repost all of these l2tp patches with proper
cover letters for a patch series.

In this particular case it's even more necessary, you posted two patch
series.  One with 2 patches and one with 8 patches.  Do they depend
upon eachother?  If so, which one goes first.  What is each patch
series doing?  How is it doing it?  And why are you doing it that way?

Those are the questions answered by a properly written header posting.

Thank you.