linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull proc and exec work for 5.7-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg5LvjumW9PVQiF7jB8yig98K8XTk4tHo9W-sYmxzW+9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:46:24 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull proc and exec work for 5.7-rc1

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:00 PM Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de> wrote:
>
> There are two more patches, which might be of interest for you, just to
> make the picture complete.
> It is not clear if we go that way, or if Eric has a yet better idea.
>
> [PATCH v7 15/16] exec: Fix dead-lock in de_thread with ptrace_attach
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3459067.html

There is no way I would ever take that patch.

The amount of confusion in that patch is not acceptable. Randomly
unlocking the new lock?

That code makes everything worse, it's completely incomprehensible,
the locking rules make no sense ahwt-so-ever.

I'm seriously starting to feel like I should not have pulled this
code, because the future looks _worse_ than what we used to have.

No. No no no. Eric, this is not an acceptable direction.

             Linus