[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi81+9roQMgf7n0YRxJ0rqK3W0ghB3tS3kngSikC7cOig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 16:28:03 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: dma <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL]: dmaengine updates for v5.7-rc1
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:25 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Here are the changes for this cycle. SFR has told me that you might see
> a merge conflict, but I am sure you would be okay with it :)
It looked trivial enough. That said, it's in the TI_K3_UDMA driver,
which I can't build. The driver is marked as COMPILE_TEST, but it also
has
depends on TI_SCI_PROTOCOL
depends on TI_SCI_INTA_IRQCHIP
which means that it depends on TI_MESSAGE_MANAGER, which in turn has a
depends on ARCH_KEYSTONE || ARCH_K3
so it may be *marked* for build testing, but it doesn't actually get
any outside of those builds.
So I did the resolution that looked trivial, but mistakes happen, and
I can't even build-test that driver..
Just a heads-up. It does look like it was _meant_ to be build-tested,
but that intent didn't work out.
Adding a COMPILE_TEST option to TI_MESSAGE_MANAGER gets things a bit
further, but even then it doesn't actually build that driver because
that TI_SCI_INTA_IRQCHIP dependency needs to be enabled too.
And that one doesn't even have a question, it's just a plain bool, and
expects to be selected. Which the arm64 platform does.
Anyway, to make a long story short: "the COMPILE_TEST marker is a lie".
So somebody should actually test my merge.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists