linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull proc and exec work for 5.7-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a73ta1vj.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date:   Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:45:04 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull proc and exec work for 5.7-rc1

Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de> writes:

> oh, sorry for that, that was requested in the peer review, I could not
> get a patch approved that does not have such a boolean, that simplified
> the error handling.

If you had included a note in your changlog when you respun my patch I
probably would have realized what you had done I would have spotted it
faster.

When I glanced at the patch quickly I thought you had just added the
missing unlock.

Eric