lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZQ=S003MqmTKSD7QTp=j7NJ6xVyGbqkDyEoARW6+O54Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:16:49 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Unconditionally assign .request()/.free()

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:05 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:

> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
> The gpiochip_generic_request() and gpiochip_generic_free() functions can
> now deal properly with chips that don't have any pin-ranges defined, so
> they can be assigned unconditionally.
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ