linux-kernel - Re: OOB access on ACPI processor thermal device via sysfs write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5h1rp6w97p.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:03:22 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:     "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OOB access on ACPI processor thermal device via sysfs write

On Thu, 02 Apr 2020 09:47:50 +0200,
Zhang, Rui wrote:
> 
> CC Viresh.
> 
> Yes, I've received it.
> 
> To me, there is not a hard rule that the cooling device max_state must be static.
> We should be able to detect the max_state change and reset the stats table when necessary.
> 
> I just finished a prototype patch to do so, and will paste it later.

Great, that sounds like a feasible option, indeed.


thanks,

Takashi

> 
> Thanks,
> rui
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> 
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 3:42 PM
> To: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>; Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: OOB access on ACPI processor thermal device via sysfs write
> Importance: High
> 
> [ My post yesterday didn't seem go out properly, so I'm resending with
>   a different MTA setup; sorry if you already received it ]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> after my recent patch [*], I started looking at the root cause more closely, and found that it's a side-effect of the device initialization order between acpi_processor_driver and cpufreq.
>   [*] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200330140859.12535-1-tiwai@suse.de/
> 
> In short:
>   
> - acpi_processor_driver_init() is called fairly early boot stage, and
>   it registers a thermal device for each CPU. 
> 
> - A thermal device allocates a statistics table with the fixed size
>   determined by get_max_state() ops call at its probe time.
>   (The table entry is updated at each time a write to thermal state
>   file happens.)
> 
>   For ACPI, processor_get_max_state() is called and it invokes
>   acpi_processor_max_state() that calculates the max states depending
>   on cpufreq, cpufreq_get_max_state().
> 
>   cpufreq_get_max_state() returns 0 at this stage because no cpufreq
>   driver is available.  So the table size is set to 1.
> 
> - Later on, after cpufreq get initialized, the following sysfs write
>   causes an OOB access and corrupts memory (eventually Oops):
>     # echo 3 > /sys/class/thermal/cooling_device0/cur_state
> 
>   The reason is that now processor_get_max_state() returns 3 as
>   cpufreq became available.  So the thermal driver believes as if it
>   were a valid value, and updates the table accordingly although it
>   overflows.
> 
> 
> My patch above detects and avoids such an overflow, but it's no real fix for the cause.  The proper fix needs either the shuffling of the device creation order or some automatic resize of statistics table.
> 
> Do you guys have any suggestion how to solve it?
> 
> FWIW, I could reproduce the problem locally on my laptop with 5.6 kernel, and I believe this can be seen generically on most of machines.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
>