[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200402092417.GA1176452@myrica>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:24:17 +0200
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"eric.auger.pro@...il.com" <eric.auger.pro@...il.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [RFC PATCH v2] iommu/virtio: Use page size bitmap
supported by endpoint
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 03:53:40AM +0000, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> > > > +struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask {
> > > > + struct virtio_iommu_probe_property head;
> > > > + __u8 reserved[4];
> > > > + __u64 pgsize_bitmap;
> >
> > Should be __le64
>
> Based on" iommu/virtio: Fix sparse warning" patch https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg41944.html changed to __u64 (not __le64)
Yes that one was only for the virtio config struct, to play nice with
other devices. We should still use __le for the other structures,
including probe properties.
Thanks,
Jean
>
> Will keep __le64.
>
> Thanks
> -Bharat
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jean
> >
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED 0
> > > > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_MSI 1
> > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists