[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <833a5e74-645a-130c-ceab-068880e0c69a@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:04:31 +0200
From: Andreas Gerstmayr <agerstmayr@...hat.com>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Martin Spier <mspier@...flix.com>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf script: add flamegraph.py script
On 26.03.20 20:04, Kim Phillips wrote:
> I now get a SIGSEGV when executing perf script report flamegraph.
>
> Here's a trace:
>
> #0 0x000055555590a9b2 in regs_map (regs=0x7fffffffbfc8, mask=16715775,
> bf=0x7fffffffba60 "", size=512) at util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c:696
> #1 0x000055555590ab03 in set_regs_in_dict (dict=0x7ffff61dd500, sample=0x7fffffffbf20,
> evsel=0x555555d7a700) at util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c:718
This error seems unrelated to flamegraph.py (occurs also with the
stackcollapse.py script).
Looks like the intr_regs->regs can be 0 when running in DWARF mode (this
error doesn't occur in the default mode). I've added a check and sent a
patch. While at it, valgrind reported an invalid read in a different
code path, which is fixed by the other patch I just sent a few minutes ago.
Can you please test again and report if there are any other issues?
Cheers,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists