[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A3312A4A-96A6-46A3-8C37-5AF5312FDF29@amacapital.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 07:53:45 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
"Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@...ix.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86,module: Detect VMX modules and disable Split-Lock-Detect
> On Apr 2, 2020, at 6:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
This seems like much more of a fixup than we would usually do for out-of-tree modules. How about just refusing to load the offending module?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists