linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] squashfs: Migrate from ll_rw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200402153506.GA13332@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:35:06 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Philippe Liard <pliard@...gle.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, phillip@...ashfs.org.uk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, groeck@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] squashfs: Migrate from ll_rw_block usage to BIO

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:20:33AM +0900, Philippe Liard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 6:28 PM Philippe Liard <pliard@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 5:37 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry for the empty reply.
> > >
> > > This was meant to say that the patch looks good to me:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> >
> > Thanks!
> 
> FYI I'm unfortunately no longer observing the 40% impact announced in the
> commit description after many optimizations landed in the Chrome OS VM
> infrastructure.
> 
> Hopefully moving to BIO is still desirable though. Thank you in any case for
> your help/guidance and all the time you spent reviewing this.

Do you still plan to submit the patch?  I think it is a major cleanup
of the codebase, so I'd like to see it land.