[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200402153505.GC4291@pflmari>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:35:05 +0200
From: Alex Riesen <alexander.riesen@...itec.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator: add a connection
from adv748x codec (HDMI input) to the R-Car SoC
Geert Uytterhoeven, Thu, Apr 02, 2020 17:26:15 +0200:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 5:03 PM Alex Riesen <alexander.riesen@...itec.com> wrote:
> > Geert Uytterhoeven, Mon, Mar 30, 2020 10:32:47 +0200:
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Alex Riesen <alexander.riesen@...itec.com> wrote:
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-common.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-common.dtsi
> > > > @@ -510,6 +511,15 @@ adv7482_txb: endpoint {
> > > > remote-endpoint = <&csi20_in>;
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > > +
> > > > + port@c {
> > > > + reg = <12>;
> > > > +
> > > > + adv7482_i2s: endpoint {
> > > > + remote-endpoint = <&rsnd_endpoint3>;
> > > > + system-clock-direction-out;
> > > > + };
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > As the adv748x driver just ignores "invalid" endpoints...
> > >
> > > > @@ -758,8 +769,19 @@ &rcar_sound {
> > > > <&cpg CPG_MOD 1020>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 1021>,
> > > > <&cpg CPG_MOD 1019>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 1018>,
> > > > <&audio_clk_a>, <&cs2000>,
> > > > - <&audio_clk_c>,
> > > > + <&adv7482_hdmi_in>,
> > > > <&cpg CPG_CORE CPG_AUDIO_CLK_I>;
> > >
> > > ... and the rsnd driver ignores nonexistent-clocks, the DT change has no
> > > hard dependency on the driver change, and won't introduce regressions
> > > when included, right?
> >
> > Well, it maybe won't, but isn't it a little ... implicit?
> > And I'm no haste to include the changes, if you mean I can (or should) submit
> > the device tree patch separately.
>
> OK, fine for me to postpone (that'll be for v5.9, I guess?).
>
Looks scary :)
But yes, fine with me too.
v5 with ssi4 dummy in a moment.
Regards,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists