[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rp5omxw.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:46:19 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@...ix.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86,module: Detect VMX modules and disable Split-Lock-Detect
"Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@...ix.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> This seems like much more of a fixup than we would usually do ....
>
> TBH, I was kinda surprised to see that patchset myself.
>
> -Kenny, guessing Linus hasn't read this far yet :)
The much we hate it, we simply have users depending on these things for
various reasons.
That said, I'm perfectly fine with changing it to 'refuse module load'.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists