[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=X1t5bxgDqg5uPz4NrxfFMSCrGVwMgtnE5snDu330s78Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:00:12 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>, lsrao@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 4/7] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Save base address of drv
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:20 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Add changes to save drv's base address for rsc. This is
> used to read drv's configuration such as solver mode is
> supported or to write into drv's registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h | 2 ++
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 11 +++++------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I still see no usage of "drv->base" outside of the probe function even
after applying your whole patch series. That implies that it can just
stay as a local variable.
If you have a later patch series that needs "drv->base" in some other
RPMH function then this patch should be moved to the front of that
series. Until then it feels like it should be dropped.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists