linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 2/3] irq_work: Fix checking of IRQ_WORK_LAZY flag set on non PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200402173944.jmztz4vjsepjreye@beryllium.lan>
Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:39:44 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/3] irq_work: Fix checking of IRQ_WORK_LAZY flag set
 on non PREEMPT_RT

Hi Pavel,

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 07:22:49PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I'm currently playing with 4.4.X branch, but I'll eventually test it.
> 
> Is it possible that 4.4.X branch needs similar patch? My code review
> suggests so...

I was waiting for Steven to post the final patch. I'll pick it up for
the next v4.4-rt release.

Thanks,
Daniel