linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] vfio/type1: Report PASID alloc/free support to userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:01:00 -0600
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Cc:     eric.auger@...hat.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, jun.j.tian@...el.com, yi.y.sun@...el.com,
        jean-philippe@...aro.org, peterx@...hat.com,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hao.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] vfio/type1: Report PASID alloc/free support to
 userspace

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 05:32:00 -0700
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com> wrote:

> From: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> 
> This patch reports PASID alloc/free availability to userspace (e.g. QEMU)
> thus userspace could do a pre-check before utilizing this feature.
> 
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       |  8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index e40afc0..ddd1ffe 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -2234,6 +2234,30 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_free(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int vfio_iommu_info_add_nesting_cap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +					 struct vfio_info_cap *caps)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_info_cap_header *header;
> +	struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_nesting *nesting_cap;
> +
> +	header = vfio_info_cap_add(caps, sizeof(*nesting_cap),
> +				   VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING, 1);
> +	if (IS_ERR(header))
> +		return PTR_ERR(header);
> +
> +	nesting_cap = container_of(header,
> +				struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_nesting,
> +				header);
> +
> +	nesting_cap->nesting_capabilities = 0;
> +	if (iommu->nesting) {
> +		/* nesting iommu type supports PASID requests (alloc/free) */
> +		nesting_cap->nesting_capabilities |= VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQS;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  				   unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -2283,6 +2307,10 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> +		ret = vfio_iommu_info_add_nesting_cap(iommu, &caps);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
>  		if (caps.size) {
>  			info.flags |= VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPS;
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 298ac80..8837219 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -748,6 +748,14 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova_range {
>  	struct	vfio_iova_range iova_ranges[];
>  };
>  
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING  2
> +
> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_nesting {
> +	struct	vfio_info_cap_header header;
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQS	(1 << 0)
> +	__u32	nesting_capabilities;
> +};
> +
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12)
>  
>  /**

I think this answers my PROBE question on patch 1/.  Should the
quota/usage be exposed to the user here?  Thanks,

Alex