| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1585896170.ohti800w9v.astroid@bobo.none>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 17:13:25 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Eric Richter <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32
Michal Suchánek's on March 25, 2020 5:38 am:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:48:20PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Michal Suchanek's on March 19, 2020 10:19 pm:
>> > There are two almost identical copies for 32bit and 64bit.
>> >
>> > The function is used only in 32bit code which will be split out in next
>> > patch so consolidate to one function.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
>> > Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>> > ---
>> > v6: new patch
>> > v8: move the consolidated function out of the ifdef block.
>> > v11: rebase on top of def0bfdbd603
>> > ---
>> > arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > index cbc251981209..c9a78c6e4361 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > @@ -161,18 +161,6 @@ static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
>> > return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8);
>> > }
>> >
>> > -static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
>> > -{
>> > - if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
>> > - ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
>> > - return -EFAULT;
>> > -
>> > - if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
>> > - return 0;
>> > -
>> > - return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
>> > {
>> > if (!sp || (sp & 7) || sp > (is_64 ? TASK_SIZE : 0x100000000UL) - 32)
>> > @@ -277,19 +265,9 @@ static void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>> > }
>> >
>> > #else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>> > -/*
>> > - * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
>> > - * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
>> > - * the page tables. Since this is called at interrupt level,
>> > - * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
>> > - */
>> > -static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
>> > +static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
>> > {
>> > - if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
>> > - ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
>> > - return -EFAULT;
>> > -
>> > - return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret));
>> > + return 0;
>> > }
>> >
>> > static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>> > @@ -312,6 +290,28 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
>> >
>> > #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>> >
>> > +/*
>> > + * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
>> > + * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
>> > + * the page tables. Since this is called at interrupt level,
>> > + * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
>> > + */
>>
>> The comment is actually probably better to stay in the 32-bit
>> read_user_stack_slow implementation. Is that function defined
>> on 32-bit purely so that you can use IS_ENABLED()? In that case
> It documents the IS_ENABLED() and that's where it is. The 32bit
> definition is only a technical detail.
Sorry for the late reply, busy trying to fix bugs in the C rewrite
series. I don't think it is the right place, it should be in the
ppc32 implementation detail. ppc64 has an equivalent comment at the
top of its read_user_stack functions.
>> I would prefer to put a BUG() there which makes it self documenting.
> Which will cause checkpatch complaints about introducing new BUG() which
> is frowned on.
It's fine in this case, that warning is about not introducing
runtime bugs, but this wouldn't be.
But... I actually don't like adding read_user_stack_slow on 32-bit
and especially not just to make IS_ENABLED work.
IMO this would be better if you really want to consolidate it
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
index cbc251981209..ca3a599b3f54 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
* interrupt context, so if the access faults, we read the page tables
* to find which page (if any) is mapped and access it directly.
*/
-static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
+static int read_user_stack_slow(const void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
{
int ret = -EFAULT;
pgd_t *pgdir;
@@ -149,28 +149,21 @@ static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
return ret;
}
-static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
+static int __read_user_stack(const void __user *ptr, void *ret, size_t size)
{
- if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned long) ||
- ((unsigned long)ptr & 7))
+ if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - size ||
+ ((unsigned long)ptr & (size - 1)))
return -EFAULT;
- if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
+ if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, size))
return 0;
- return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8);
+ return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, size);
}
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
{
- if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
- ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
- return 0;
-
- return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
+ return __read_user_stack(ptr, ret, sizeof(*ret));
}
static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
@@ -283,13 +276,13 @@ static void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
* the page tables. Since this is called at interrupt level,
* do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
*/
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+static int __read_user_stack(const void __user *ptr, void *ret, size_t size)
{
- if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
- ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
+ if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - size ||
+ ((unsigned long)ptr & (size - 1)))
return -EFAULT;
- return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret));
+ return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, size);
}
static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
@@ -312,6 +305,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
+static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+{
+ return __read_user_stack(ptr, ret, sizeof(*ret));
+}
+
/*
* Layout for non-RT signal frames
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists