[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200403075613.GA2788@workstation-portable>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:26:13 +0530
From: Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 RESEND] auditsc: Do not use RCU primitive to read
from cred pointer
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:56:36AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:57 AM Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com> wrote:
> > task_struct::cred is only used task-synchronously and does
> > not require any RCU locks, hence, rcu_dereference_check is
> > not required to read from it.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/auditsc.c | 15 +++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> This is the exact same patch I ACK'd back in February, yes?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-audit/CAHC9VhQCbg1V290bYEZM+izDPRpr=XYXakohnDaMphkBBFgUaA@mail.gmail.com
>
Hi Paul,
That's correct. I've resend the series out of the fear that the first 2
patches might've gotten lost as it's been almost a month since I last
sent them. Could you please ack this again, and if you don't mind could
you please go through the other 2 patches and ack them aswell?
Thanks
Amol
> > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > index 4effe01ebbe2..d3510513cdd1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > @@ -430,24 +430,19 @@ static int audit_field_compare(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > /* Determine if any context name data matches a rule's watch data */
> > /* Compare a task_struct with an audit_rule. Return 1 on match, 0
> > * otherwise.
> > - *
> > - * If task_creation is true, this is an explicit indication that we are
> > - * filtering a task rule at task creation time. This and tsk == current are
> > - * the only situations where tsk->cred may be accessed without an rcu read lock.
> > */
> > static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > struct audit_krule *rule,
> > struct audit_context *ctx,
> > struct audit_names *name,
> > - enum audit_state *state,
> > - bool task_creation)
> > + enum audit_state *state)
> > {
> > const struct cred *cred;
> > int i, need_sid = 1;
> > u32 sid;
> > unsigned int sessionid;
> >
> > - cred = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->cred, tsk == current || task_creation);
> > + cred = tsk->cred;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < rule->field_count; i++) {
> > struct audit_field *f = &rule->fields[i];
> > @@ -745,7 +740,7 @@ static enum audit_state audit_filter_task(struct task_struct *tsk, char **key)
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_TASK], list) {
> > if (audit_filter_rules(tsk, &e->rule, NULL, NULL,
> > - &state, true)) {
> > + &state)) {
> > if (state == AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT)
> > *key = kstrdup(e->rule.filterkey, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > @@ -791,7 +786,7 @@ static enum audit_state audit_filter_syscall(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, list, list) {
> > if (audit_in_mask(&e->rule, ctx->major) &&
> > audit_filter_rules(tsk, &e->rule, ctx, NULL,
> > - &state, false)) {
> > + &state)) {
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > ctx->current_state = state;
> > return state;
> > @@ -815,7 +810,7 @@ static int audit_filter_inode_name(struct task_struct *tsk,
> >
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, list, list) {
> > if (audit_in_mask(&e->rule, ctx->major) &&
> > - audit_filter_rules(tsk, &e->rule, ctx, n, &state, false)) {
> > + audit_filter_rules(tsk, &e->rule, ctx, n, &state)) {
> > ctx->current_state = state;
> > return 1;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.24.1
>
> --
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists