[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158587766752.125146.7582840761926137726@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:34:27 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Mathieu Olivari <mathieu@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: qcom: Disable i2c device on gsbi4 for ipq806x
Quoting Ansuel Smith (2020-03-30 13:56:46)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c
> index b0eee0903807..f7d7a2bc84c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c
> @@ -991,6 +991,7 @@ static struct clk_branch gsbi4_h_clk = {
> .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> .name = "gsbi4_h_clk",
> .ops = &clk_branch_ops,
> + .flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
Is this necessary? Shouldn't we skip clks that are protected during the
unused phase?
> },
> },
> };
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists