linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] serial: uartps: Revert dynamic port allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200403094427.GA3754220@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:44:27 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc:     johan@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu,
        git@...inx.com, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] serial: uartps: Revert dynamic port allocation

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:37:46AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 03. 04. 20 11:32, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:24:29AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> there were several changes done in past in uartps drivers which have been
> >> also done in uartlite driver.
> >> Here is the thread about it
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20191203152738.GF10631@localhost/
> >>
> >> This series reverts all patches which enabled dynamic port allocation and
> >> returning driver to the previous state. There were added some features in
> >> meantime which are not affected by this series.
> > 
> > Should this go into 5.7-final as it's causing problems now, and
> > backported as well?  Or can it wait until 5.8-rc1?
> 
> These patches have been added to v4.20. It means all version from that
> are affected.
> 
> The issue I am aware of is when you setup stdout-path =
> "serialX:115200n8" where X is not 0.
> 
> But as was discussed the concept is based on Johan wrong that's why it
> can be consider as bug fix.

Ok, I'll queue these up after 5.7-rc1 is out, for inclusion in
5.7-final, and cc: for stable, as I agree, they should all be reverted.
Thanks for doing the work.

greg k-h