linux-kernel - Re: Cleanups in "next" tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:49:47 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Cleanups in "next" tree

Pavel

On 4/2/20 5:57 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sun 2020-03-22 14:35:56, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On 3/22/20 12:59 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I've commited some cleanups into LED tree ( git/pavel/linux-leds.git
>>> branch for-next ), if someone wants to review them.
>> You abused your maintainer power by bypassing the usual patch
>> submission procedure. Please remove the patches from linux-next
>> and submit them officially for discussion. I would have some objections
>> to them.
> I'm sorry I failed to meet your high expectations... But I don't
> believe I done anything completely outside of usual kernel procedures.

So I can push a public tree out and request reviewers to review that 
tree and expect it to get merged once the review is complete without 
ever posting the patches to linux-leds?

This would be the precedent you are setting here as maintainer.

And Jacek does not have high expectations he is just requesting that we 
follow the process as defined in the Linux kernel document

Dan