linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Add support for printing V4L2 and DRM fourccs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a5d0029edb7328691f1a08009d564c576924a3eb.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 03 Apr 2020 06:11:22 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        hverkuil@...all.nl,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        Ville Syrjälä 
        <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Add support for printing V4L2 and DRM
 fourccs

On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 09:37 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 11:34 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > Or could we conceive of a way to make this locally extensible yet safe,
> > > letting callers use something like %{foo}, as well as providing a
> > > locally relevant function to do the conversion?
> > 
> > No.  printf validation would be broken.
> 
> I tossed the idea on a whim, and thinking further I could probably come
> up with a number of challenges, but care to elaborate on what you see as
> the problem in validation?

I understand you to want to add something like

	%<m> where m is a non-standard format specifier

so using using gcc's extension of

__attribute__((__format__(printf, string_index, first_to_check))

could not validate the argument type against use of the %<m>
in the format string.

	printk("%a\n", a);

Compiler bleats.