[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200403145523.GC162390@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:55:23 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Deadlock due to "cpuset: Make cpuset hotplug synchronous"
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:15:32AM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 03/25/20 15:19, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 03:16:56PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > The linux-next commit a49e4629b5ed (“cpuset: Make cpuset hotplug synchronous”)
> > > introduced real deadlocks with CPU hotplug as showed in the lockdep splat, since it is
> > > now making a relation from cpu_hotplug_lock —> cgroup_mutex.
> >
> > Prateek, can you please take a look? Given that the merge window is just around
> > the corner, we might have to revert and retry later if it can't be resolved
> > quickly.
>
> I've ran cpuset_hotplug and cpuhotplug LTP tests using next-20200325 but
> couldn't reproduce it.
>
> Hopefully that can be fixed, but if you had to revert it, do you mind picking
> this instead to fix the LTP issue I encountered before?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200211141554.24181-1-qais.yousef@arm.com/
So, I'd rather not, for now anyway. It isn't a real problem and I don't wanna
add a wait vector there.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists