[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3248809.1585928191@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:36:31 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, dray@...hat.com,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, andres@...razel.de,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Subject: Re: Upcoming: Notifications, FS notifications and fsinfo()
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de> wrote:
> BTW, while we are at it: one more thing I'd love to see exposed by
> statx() is a simple flag whether the inode is a mount point.
Note that an inode or a dentry might be a mount point in one namespace, but
not in another. Do you actually mean an inode - or do you actually mean the
(mount,dentry) pair that you're looking at? (Ie. should it be namespace
specific?)
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists