linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Remove the warning in wq_worker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200403174500.75rwuijdri5ewl5c@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:45:00 -0400
From:   Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, LKP <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Remove the warning in wq_worker_sleeping()

Hi Sebastian,

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:29:59AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> v1…v2: - Drop the warning instead of using cmpxchg_local().
> 	 Tglx pointed out that wq_worker_sleeping() is already invoked
> 	 with disabled preemption so the race described can not happen.

I guess you mean this race:

> However, if the interrupt occurs in wq_worker_sleeping() between reading and
> setting `sleeping' i.e.
> 
> |        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(worker->sleeping))
> |                return;
>  *interrupt*
> |        worker->sleeping = 1;
> 
> then pool->nr_running will be decremented twice in wq_worker_sleeping()
> but it will be incremented only once in wq_worker_running().

Why would preemption prevent it?  Interrupts are still enabled.

What am I missing?  :-)