linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] ipmi: Add missing annotation for ipmi_ssif_lock_cond() and ipmi_ssif_unlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200403183550.GS2910@minyard.net>
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:35:50 -0500
From:   Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To:     Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "moderated list:IPMI SUBSYSTEM" 
        <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ipmi: Add missing annotation for
 ipmi_ssif_lock_cond() and ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond()

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:05:05PM +0100, Jules Irenge wrote:
> Sparse reports a warning at ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond()
> 	and ipmi_ssif_lock_cond()
> 
> warning: context imbalance in ipmi_ssif_lock_cond()
> 	- wrong count at exit
>  warning: context imbalance in ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond()
> 	- unexpected unlock
> 
> The root cause is the missing annotation at ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond()
> 	and ipmi_ssif_lock_cond()
> 
> Add the missing __acquires(&ata_scsi_rbuf_lock)
> Add the missing __releases(&ata_scsi_rbuf_lock)

Yeah, this is good, I've included it in my tree.

-corey

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> index 22c6a2e61236..030e7c09e44f 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int start_send(struct ssif_info *ssif_info,
>  
>  static unsigned long *ipmi_ssif_lock_cond(struct ssif_info *ssif_info,
>  					  unsigned long *flags)
> +	__acquires(&ssif_info->lock)
>  {
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_info->lock, *flags);
>  	return flags;
> @@ -320,6 +321,7 @@ static unsigned long *ipmi_ssif_lock_cond(struct ssif_info *ssif_info,
>  
>  static void ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond(struct ssif_info *ssif_info,
>  				  unsigned long *flags)
> +	__releases(&ssif_info->lock)
>  {
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_info->lock, *flags);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.24.1
>