[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 22:53:04 -0400
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-audit@...hat.com,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 RESEND] auditsc: Do not use RCU primitive to read
from cred pointer
On 2020-04-03 17:43, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On 2020-04-03 13:26, Amol Grover wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:56:36AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:57 AM Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > task_struct::cred is only used task-synchronously and does
> > > > > not require any RCU locks, hence, rcu_dereference_check is
> > > > > not required to read from it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> > > > > Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > kernel/auditsc.c | 15 +++++----------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > This is the exact same patch I ACK'd back in February, yes?
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-audit/CAHC9VhQCbg1V290bYEZM+izDPRpr=XYXakohnDaMphkBBFgUaA@mail.gmail.com
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > That's correct. I've resend the series out of the fear that the first 2
> > > patches might've gotten lost as it's been almost a month since I last
> > > sent them. Could you please ack this again, and if you don't mind could
> > > you please go through the other 2 patches and ack them aswell?
> >
> > Via who's tree are you expecting this will make it upstream?
>
> When I asked a similar question back in February the response was
> basically not the audit tree.
Well, I went checking mingo and akpm's trees and didn't find 1/3 and 2/3
there even though I thought 3/3 was in audit/stable-5.6. I was mistaken,
that patch in audit/stable-5.6 is a previous rcu fix for auditd_conn and
not 3/3.
> paul moore
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
Powered by blists - more mailing lists