[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 09:06:46 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar@....co.uk>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Cc: Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Fix patch mode for
dma_alloc_coherent()
> Commit dfd32cad146e ("dma-mapping: remove dma_zalloc_coherent()"), in
> removing dma_zalloc_coherent() treewide, inadvertently removed the patch
> rule for dma_alloc_coherent(), leaving Coccinelle unable to auto-generate
> patches for this case. Fix this.
I suggest to reconsider also the distribution of recipients for your patch
according to the fields “Cc” and “To”.
Will the software development attention grow in a way so that further
implementation details can be adjusted also for the mentioned SmPL script?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists